No Limit Tools
Tools › Compress Image

Compress an image

Name the file size you need and let the tool try qualities until it lands under it. Or turn the slider yourself.

Hits a target size Live comparison Runs on your device

How to use it

01

Drop the image in

Drag it over or click to choose. The work happens inside your browser; the file is never uploaded anywhere.

02

Name the target

Say “under 100 KB” and the tool tries qualities until it finds the best fit. Or leave the target free and turn the quality slider yourself.

03

Check it by eye

Before and after, side by side. The saving line tells you how much smaller it got. If the difference bothers you, loosen the target a little.

How the target size is found

No formula, only measurement

There is no calculable relationship between a quality setting and a file size — at the same quality a photo of the sky comes out small and a crowded street scene comes out large. The only way is to try.

Binary search

The tool halves the quality range: if it fits, it goes up; if it does not, it goes down. In eight tries it finds the highest quality that still lands under the target.

Limit

Sometimes it cannot be done

You cannot get a 4000-pixel photograph down to 50 KB; even the lowest quality is not enough. When that happens the tool says so instead of staying quiet — the fix is to reduce the dimensions (Resize Image).

Which quality value

90–100

Print and archive

Almost nothing is thrown away and the file stays large. Stay in this range for images that will be edited again later.

75–85

The default range

Web, sharing, email attachments. On most photographs the difference is invisible.

40–70

Hard limit

For when the file simply must get under a ceiling. Blotching starts to show in flat areas — sky, walls.

Worth knowing

PNG has no quality setting

PNG is lossless: since it throws nothing away, there is no “squeeze it a bit more”. If you genuinely need a photograph to get smaller, switch the format to JPG or WebP — the loss is invisible and the saving is large.

WebP is smaller at the same quality

At equal visual quality WebP takes clearly less space than JPG, and it carries transparency too. The right choice for a website; for email and older systems JPG is still the safer one.

Careful

Compression cannot be undone

Detail that is dropped does not come back. Compressing an already compressed file over and over piles up marks — always start from the original.

Common questions

My image will not fit in an email

Set the target to 2 MB (safe for Gmail), or a little under whatever your system allows. If you are sending several images, remember the total counts.

How much quality is lost?

You see it directly in the “After” frame on the right — no guessing needed. Zoom in and look at flat areas and hard edges; that is where it shows first.

Do EXIF and location data survive?

They do not. Re-encoding in the browser drops the metadata. If that is your actual goal, Remove EXIF Data is the better route: there you first see what is in the file, then strip it without re-compressing the picture.

Should I reduce the dimensions as well?

Usually yes — you would never display a 4000-pixel photograph larger than about 1600 pixels on the web. Setting “longest edge” to 1600 buys you more than lowering the quality, and it shows less.

Related tools